Internet reports that the Bitcoin Core Project yesterday issued a statement on its core development and transaction relay strategy, recommending a non-interference attitude towards the use of Bitcoin networks. However, the move aroused strong dissatisfaction from the Bitcoin community, and analyzed that it may lead to divisions in the community: 1. Samson Mow, CEO of JAN3, said that Bitcoin Core developers have been gradually changing the network, but the statement that "this is it now, it's too bad" is not appropriate; 2. Casa founder Jameson Lopp said: Bitcoin Core developers are a group. They say that we can't force anyone to run code they don't like. This statement is like conducting public relations, but when there is no unified information, it is just a group of independent developers. When the statement is issued, such public relations performance is not good; 3. Bitcoin developer Carl Horton said: Bitcoin is a "coin", not a "bucket", or a "store", or any general data store, but a peer-to-peer electronic cash system; 4. Luke Dashjr, developer of Bitcoin Core, said: The transaction relay targets listed in the statement are basically wrong. Predicting what information will be mined is a centralized goal. The main goal of transaction relay is to predict the Bitcoin transactions to be mined, and it is harmful to help spread spam.