HawkInsight

  • Contact Us
  • App
  • English

Opinion: The trusted neutrality of BTC and ETH is defined by three aspects: token allocation and transparency, jurisdiction relationships and developer platforms

On May 11, David Marcus, former head of Facebook's stablecoin project, issued an article on the X platform refuting 1confirmation founder Nick Tomaino's belief that ETH is by no means neutral. In response, Nick Tomaino said that credible neutrality can be defined from three aspects: 1. Token allocation and transparency: The internal allocation of BTC is 0%. Anyone can participate as a PoW miner and is completely transparent. ETH has 10% internal allocation, which has previously used PoW mining, while Solana's internal allocation accounted for 62%. In the early stage, token allocation and verifiers were not disclosed, resulting in an overall lack of transparency; 2. Jurisdiction relationship: Bitcoin launched the Internet native, Ethereum built the Internet native together with the global community, Solana is more like a "corporate token" and participated in U.S. lobbying; 3. Developer platform: Bitcoin does not have a good developer platform, but Ethereum has a large number of important use cases (stablecoins, DeFi, NFT, forecast markets, decentralized social, etc.). Ethereum prioritizes providing decentralized platforms for developers and companies. Coinbase, Blackrock, Fidelity, Stripe, Kraken, Deutsche Bank, Sony, Visa, Polymarket, Uniswap, Aave, and Opensea are all building the Ethereum ecosystem.

Disclaimer: The views in this article are from the original Creator and do not represent the views or position of Hawk Insight. The content of the article is for reference, communication and learning only, and does not constitute investment advice. If it involves copyright issues, please contact us for deletion.

NewFlashHawk Insight
More